Procedure on how to check if the cables work. In order to do that you will need to go to the settings (CW button), where you can see the bars for the connection levels. You need to choose the page for the head. First, remove the one-time use electrodes from the connectors on the cable. After that you will need to place the metal parts inside the red and black connectors on the cable (where you put the one-time electrodes) together to see if there is any conductance (should be close to 100). Do the same with yellow and green connectors. If you see this conductance in both cases, the cable works good and in case of a connection problem, it is the patient’s side of the connection that needs to be checked (forehead could be moistened with water, tightened with the headband, etc.). Question: Are the forehead cables interchangeable with the hands and feet cables and what is the cost of another cable when CUSTOMER is under warranty? Answer: The forehead cables are different from others. For patient’s convenience, they were specifically designed to have longer parts leading to the connectors from the separating block. I wouldn’t make the cables change if it is not completely necessary. If the test I described before was successful, the cable replacement will not change their situation, so they will have to pay for the order of an additional one. As for the price, it would be around 45 USD + delivery.

FAQs Archive

Q: Evidence basis for Equipment

This equipment has a medical CE mark and manufacturer has accreditation according to the International standards for medical equipment manufacturing - ISO 13485 Quality Management System. Therefore, the manufacturer is responsible for quality and validation of the manufactured equipment. Additionally, I attach the Clinical evaluation report. It is including information about validation of the system. See clinical evaluation report HERE .

Q: ES Teck/ES Complex 3.5

Questions: I have attached photos of two issues I am having with my ES Complex 3.5. In opening the living tissue link, I got an error message about 6 to 8 times. Valsalva ratio. The box read N/A on two different occasions, November 10, 2018 and then again February 9, 2019. What is the adequate time between scans…minutes or days? If I have an error and try a redo on the same person, then there is some discrepancies between the two scans. Is it a frequent issue? Do jewelry, rings, keys or watches affect the reading? I get variations in the RI (Reflection Index) readings when the scans are only two weeks apart on the same person, is that normal? Answers: I have fixed the message in the living tissue link part Probably the pulse wave reading was not accurate during Valsalva test and it was necessary to repeat the exam The adequate Time between scans is more than 20 min. The EIS measurements provoke an output of sweat during some minutes and the humidity could distort the results. Jewelry, rings, keys or watches can change bio impedance values and strength of the pulse wave. It’s better to take off. RI is related to small arteries stiffness. It can change during the time, it depends on lifestyle.

Q: Dental Panel Description

[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent="no" equal_height_columns="no" menu_anchor="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="center center" background_repeat="no-repeat" fade="no" background_parallax="none" parallax_speed="0.3" video_mp4="" video_webm="" video_ogv="" video_url="" video_aspect_ratio="16:9" video_loop="yes" video_mute="yes" overlay_color="" video_preview_image="" border_size="" border_color="" border_style="solid" padding_top="" padding_bottom="" padding_left="" padding_right=""][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type="1_1" layout="1_1" background_position="left top" background_color="" border_size="" border_color="" border_style="solid" border_position="all" spacing="yes" background_image="" background_repeat="no-repeat" padding_top="" padding_right="" padding_bottom="" padding_left="" margin_top="0px" margin_bottom="0px" class="" id="" animation_type="" animation_speed="0.3" animation_direction="left" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" center_content="no" last="no" min_height="" hover_type="none" link=""][fusion_text] Dental Panel We have 32 teeth in the dental panel. The numbers are assigned according to standard dental classification (11 .. 48). Right part / Upper jaw numbers: 11 .. 18 (8 teeth) Left part / Upper jaw numbers: 21 .. 28 (8 teeth) Right part / Lower jaw numbers: 31 .. 38 (8 teeth) Left part / Lower jaw numbers: 41 .. 48 (8 teeth) It is easy to understand if you select any tooth - click on tooth in 3D image. It is showing the number and links to vertebral segments for the selected tooth on the top. [/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Q: Cortisol test and our ANS test

Question: I have a question from a Physician/ FM Doctor who I scanned, and who is very keen to help promote the Multiscan, though she has found a discrepancy between the results of the ANS testing with the MS, and an Adrenal Profile Test, which has come back with the opposite result. I have attached a screenshot of the results of the test that she had with Cortisol Awakening Response - link to website here and a couple of screenshots from the ANS results from the Multiscan. I wondered if you can have a look at the discrepancy, or at least help me to understand our results, so I can go back and relay that to Dr ——-. Here is her message to me: Hi —— my cortisol salivary test came back as way above the highest range - total sympathetic stress level but the multiscan said clearly I was in parasympathetic overdrive - how can it be explained? my test was the Adrenal Profile with Cortisol Awakening Response which showed in a sympathetic deranged level - indicating high level of stress as opposed to the parasympathetic dominance which multiscan identified - almost at the same time will scan it separately I want to be a major proponent of the multiscan but would want to understand this discrepancy thank you very much Answer: Hi —— We have looked at the results and think that it is incorrect to compare the results like this. The peak of cortisol due to the saliva collection results was between 7 and 9 AM while our test has been performed at the daytime already when the cortisol level has significantly decreased. As the test also shows the current condition of autonomic nervous system, it might be necessary to make multiple tests as well for the estimation of its condition throughout the day.

0

FAQs

Receive a FREE Guide on How to Increase Your Patient Engagement